Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Monday, June 25, 2012

Bishop backs Truth Reconciliation Commission call

RK Anand
 | June 25, 2012
Bishop Paul Tan lends his support to Bersih chairperson S Ambiga's proposal. He also says that the present government discriminates against those who do not profess Islam.


PETALING JAYA: A vocal Catholic leader has backed the call to set up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to look into corruption and other issues such as race relations if Pakatan Rakyat forms the federal government.


Focusing on freedoms, Bishop Paul Tan said these, especially religious freedom, and truth sprung from the dignity of being human beings and curtailing them was an act aligned with the devil.

“It is the smothering to death the dignity of being a human being – the truth of being a genuine human being,” he told FMT.
The head of the Malacca and Johor diocese was responding to Bersih chairperson S Ambiga’s proposal to form the TRC instead of going on a witchhunt against the corrupt if the opposition bloc seized federal power
Arguing that it would not bode well for a nation in transition to be burdened with such court proceedings, the former Bar Council president suggested that amnesty be extended to those who came clean and cooperated to allow the commission to recover lost assets.
Ambiga also said that the TRC should look into other issues which had affected the nation during the course of Barisan Nasional’s protracted rule.

Reconciliation is necessary
Refraining from taking sides with either political bloc, Tan explained why he supported the proposal put forth by the Bersih chairperson.
“A human being is born with an intrinsic elan or a thrust for freedom to search for truth which should lead ultimately to love, concretely, acceptance of each other just as God accepts us with all our goodness and sinfulness,” he said.
“But to attain this type of intrinsic search for true freedom, one must remove all obstacles in its way, such as prejudices, biased opinions, hatred, anger, craving for money that leads to corruption, etc. This means that reconciliation with others must be a prerequisite to attain true freedom.
“One cannot love another different [cultural, racial or religious] from oneself [acceptance of another as he or she is] without first being reconciled. Therefore, reconciliation is a necessary step to love of others,” he added.
Therefore, Tan said all, be it from BN, Pakatan or NGOs should support the TRC because it touched the basic nature of being a human being.
The present govt discriminates
Without mincing his words, the bishop said the fact that the present government discriminated against those who did not profess Islam could not be denied.
He noted that the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) had submitted numerous memorandums to the government complaining about this discrimination.
“It is too long for me to go into the string of unhappiness brought up by MCCBCHST. But just to give a few examples: the enormous difficulty to get approval for the building of a church or temple, the lack of burial grounds for non-Muslims, the unethical methods employed to convert non-Mulims to become Muslims, etc. etc.
“Hardly anything is done to rectify this discrimination,” he said.
Over the years, there had been several contentious issues which put the government and Christian leaders at loggerheads, among them, an accusation by the Umno-owned daily Utusan Malaysia that Christians were plotting to take over the government.
The row over using the term Allah in Malay language bibles also witnessed the fire-bombing of several churches, leaving the Christians incensed.
Fearing that this could lead to an electoral backlash, Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak last July visited the Vatican, where he met Pope Benedict XVI, to embellish his secular image.
‘Enough is enough!’
Meanwhile, Tan also posed a stinging question to religious leaders.
“Have we subtly compromised our position in order that we can get financial aid from the ruling coalition – through various political parties?” he asked.
The bishop said while his statements were not crafted to inflame any quarter, the matter however needed to be put across.
“What must be said must be said clear and loudly: enough is enough!
“No lies, no corruption, no manipulation of others, etc., because finally, truth will rear its head and justice will be done for the peace of all,” he added.
Tan explained that he did not imply that donations, even from the government, cannot be accepted but stressed that these must come without strings attached.
“Donation without condition is a blessing. Receiving monetary gifts tied directly or indirectly to political interests is insidious and unethical,” he said.
“It is not a moral stand that I take. It is to search with all of you for truth in the midst of the Malaysian political situation where religion is made used of by politicians for their end and politics is played to enhance one’s religion.
“I am sure there is room for different opinions in this loaded question. At least, we dare face,” he added.
Ambiga’s TRC proposal came in the wake of DAP strongman Lim Kit Siang’s remark that Dr Mahathir Mohamad was intensively campaigning for BN because he feared prosecution under a Pakatan government.
Denying that he had indulged in corrupt practices and abused his powers during his 22 years in office, the former premier accused his long-time political foe of wanting to see him jailed or put to death.
This drew flak from Lim, who said that he harboured no such desire but stressed that Mahathir should not block a full investigation into the numerous financial scandals during the latter’s term.
The TRC proposal was also backed by PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar, who stated that Pakatan was more interested in rescuing the nation as opposed to prosecuting Mahathir.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Najib’s hypocrisy


Saturday, 23 July 2011 Combat

By Ronald Benjamin

The statement by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak that Christians have to respect Islam before they are respected is disappointing because one would have expected the prime minister to speak in an inclusive tone since he articulated the importance of a global coalition of moderates in his overseas trip.

A leader who sincerely believes in moderation would have said that it is time for Muslims and Christians to work together to promote peace, justice and prosperity in the country.

It is this type of statement that would have been most welcome instead of demanding respect on an imaginary assumption that Christians have no respect for Islam.

How does he come to this type of conclusion? What is the evidence to show that Christians have no respect for Islam?

The prime minister, from time to time, has shown that he is incapable of courage and honesty in dealing with religious matters as that would make him look weak among extremist elements in his party.

This has made him a weak leader who is not capable of confronting extremism in his own party besides having a poor understanding of human rights. It reveals elements of poor governance.

The question is why he has chosen a right-wing tone in conceptualising the relationship between Muslims and Christians, after establishing diplomatic relations with Vatican?

Is it to show to right-wing groups that he is a firm Muslim leader in dealing with Christians, and diplomatic relations with Vatican have no bearing on current issues such as the usage of the word Allah in the Bible? Would this type of tone start the ball rolling for upcoming propaganda for the general election in ensuring the Muslim-majority vote?

The characteristics of credible leadership are its ability to dialogue and proactively solve problems and take a principled and inclusive position on issues of great importance that has major implications on the future of the country in terms of the common good, and not take the country towards destruction by playing to the tune of influential extremist voices.

A resolution on the usage of the word Allah in the Bible is a test of Najib’s governance on whether common good would triumph over exclusivity.

The so-called slogan of a coalition of moderates should start in one’s own backyard.

Source: http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/42295-najibs-hypocrisy?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Thursday, September 9, 2010

宗教必须彼此包容

回教徒计划在纽约双子塔旧址附近建立回教堂,引起一些美国人反对。甚至佛罗里达州一个五旬宗教会特里琼斯(Terry Jones)牧师号召基督徒在911日,即911的九周年焚烧可兰经。琼斯是其一反对建纽约回教堂者,但却不以此为烧可兰经为由,而是以可兰经是邪恶的为由。

这种激进的行为是少数,不代表全世界整个正信的基督徒,我们不会认同他们的行为。华人有言:“冤冤相报何时了?”美国人在911事件后反恐至今,并没有成功消灭恐怖分子的威胁,因为他们采用武力是一种错误的策略。

基督徒必须依从耶稣的榜样行事,他责备那些对宗教不包容的憎恨行为。有一次,耶稣和门徒进入一个撒玛利亚的村庄,村民不接受耶稣,雅各和约翰就要求从天降火烧掉他们,耶稣责备他俩。

当耶稣被人抓拿去受审时,彼得用刀削落大祭司仆人的耳朵,耶稣医好他耳朵随即责备彼得:“把你的刀收回原处!凡动刀的必死在刀下。”所以用暴力并不是耶稣在世时叫人悔改的方式。

我们的世界越来越变得动荡,因为各宗教里头有激进的信徒。我们应该彼此包容,大家和平相处。无论什么宗教,若要赢取别人接纳的话,应该通过耐心,爱心和饶恕。若要看到社会和谐,各人只要谦卑,看别人比自己强。当别人使用强硬方式对待我们时,若硬碰硬就肯定撞板,只有用软却能化解。孔子说:“己所不欲,勿施于人!”我们要别人怎样待我们,我们也要这样待别人。

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Malaysian Christians banned from visiting Israel

I am a Malaysian Christian cum Minister. I am saving up so as to visit Israel one day. But I was disappointed as a new ruling was imposed lately that we are not allowed to visit Israel anymore. Can Christians both at home and abroad help pray and fight for our rights to do so? And I urge boards from CFM, NECF and Denomination Councils could write in or meet up with the PM for petition. I still hold hope there is a u-turn in situation.
------------------------------


Allow us our pilgrimages to Israel

Malaysian
Aug 25, 10
12:44pm

The joint call by DAP and MCA to rescind the 'Allah ban' to Home Ministry is definitely welcomed by not only all Christians but all Malaysians who value unity and harmony in our society.

Freedom of religion is enshrined in our constitution, and the government of the day must allow all religions to practise their faith. Religion must not be politicized ,or used as a tool to gain political mileage.

It is usually fear and ignorance that leads to misunderstanding among religious groups. Many who supported the Allah ban do not fully understand the issue. Just as many do not bother that there are significant differences between Christianity and Judaism, though both groups consider Israel as their holy land.

It was indeed a sad day for Christians in Malaysia when our government decided to impose a ban on travel to Israel. Before the ban, limited travel was allowed for religious purposes and pilgrimages.

When Malaysia did not recognize China, it still allowed travel to China for medical reasons. By the same token , it is the cry of Malaysian Christians to allow visits to Israel for religious purposes. A pilgrim to the holy land of Israel is as important to Christians as the Haj is important to our Muslim brothers.

Christians, when they are in Israel, strictly observe their pilgrimage and religious observances. Normally visits to places of importance in Jesus Christ's life and in the Bible are visited.

Many people, for lack of knowledge, do not know that Jesus Christ is not recognized in Judaism at all. At least in Islam, Christ is recognized as a prophet. Christian pilgrimages and tours of Israel do not have an iota of political element.

From the bottom of all Christian hearts, this appeal is made to our government, especially to our prime minister, to reconsider relaxing its rule on visits to Israel. Please consider visits for religious pilgrimages and visits. Do not politicize religion, Be a prime minister for all people and all religions in Malaysia.

Source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/141041