Showing posts with label Malaysian Parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malaysian Parliament. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

维护国会当有的民声平台

    我国第13届大选后,出现许多针对少数族群和其宗教极端或打压的言论。有一种跟以往不同的现象,就是不在中央内阁的马华和民政议员开始反驳那些言论,斥责友族的行为,看起来好像它们已经痛定思痛,欲挽回华社的信任。

        这种现象是可喜可贺的,不过无论怎样驳斥,似乎极端的言论非但没有改善,反而有增无减!举例,最近国家领袖发表“先照顾支持国阵选民”的言论;上诉庭“阿拉”判决后有人发表“不满判决可移民”等之类的言论,国阵华裔领袖斥责,但有效吗?我在此阐释原因,并作建议:

        种族极端事件新闻,还有国阵华裔领袖驳斥友族极端言论和行为,中文报刊登,但马来报和英文报不刊登,也等于友族往往听不到华裔的不满。这说明为何极端言论无止休原因,包括学校一而再,再而三地发生“回中国,回印度”言论事件。

        虽然非硬体的马来文的电子媒体也报道马华和民政的反驳言论,但观看505大选国阵只赢得47%选票,比民联的51%少,却可以执政,证明是乡区人支持国阵。他们不用网络,只阅读马来文报及收看免费电视节目,所以对国家真正的课题不了解。所以一些极端主义者仍然爽于玩弄极端课题,因为乡下人只晓得被操纵的声音!

        我的建议很简单,就是希望巫统以外的国阵成员党议员,在国会敢秉持代表选民的身份发言。驳斥的言论不要只在中文报发表文告,也要在国会提出来。因为你们不讲,友族不知道你们的不满。举个例,前首相马哈迪曾经对记者声称,印裔的问题今天变得严重,原因是三美威鲁在位时不曾向他提起印裔困境。

        巫统要强大,还是需要靠国阵成员党的支持的。把成员党边沿化对国阵不利,虽然巫统比第12届大选增加议席,但国阵本身却退步,削减了七个议席。国阵要改革才能赢回民心,要作全民的政府,不是单一种族的政府。马来人对巫统的支持率已经达到饱和点,抛弃非马来人乃看走眼。

        国阵要改革,必须让国会变得民主,允许在朝在野的议员发表民声。国会的会议,每句言论都记录在案,让相关部门更清楚需要去处理和纠正的问题。记者也会报道国会新闻。国阵政府也应该嘱咐马来报和英文报不要偏颇地选择国会新闻。在国会投票时,朝野阵线,尤其是国阵,应该允许自己的议员凭良心投票。这是给国阵作出的“怎样改革”的建议。

        公义使邦国兴起,否则的话,要成为先进国也只是口号,因为先进国的定义,除了硬体的繁荣及富裕外,更是“公平对待人民,民主开放的言论,和谐共处的社会,平等的国民地位”等的。在资讯唾手可得的今天,没有政权可以沿用一贯的手法仍然可得逞。国民肯定是越来越明智的,国阵若不设法赢得民心,书写就已经在墙壁上!

Friday, July 5, 2013

Controversial Bill on conversion of minors withdrawn

UPDATED @ 08:04:51 PM 05-07-2013
BY JENNIFER GOMEZ AND LEE SHI-IAN
JULY 05, 2013
The Cabinet has decided to withdraw the proposal allowing for the conversion of minors to Islam by a single parent.
In a statement today, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said the cabinet made the decision to withdraw the proposed Administration of the Religion of Islam (Federal Territories) Bill 2013, to ensure that any religious decision made is fair to all, the New Straits Times reported.
“We also want to give time to the government and all parties to review the bill holistically and will only re-table the bill once we achieve a consensus,” he said.
While welcoming the withdrawal of the controversial unilateral conversion Bill, some quarters hope that the government would not attempt to introduce another Bill with the same clauses.

Malaysian Consultative Council on Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) deputy president Jagir Singh said it was only right to withdraw the Administration of Religion of Islam (Federal Territories) Bill 2013 so that it did not affect the unity of the country.
He, however, hopes that the offending clauses will not resurface in another Bill.

"The efforts of all the stakeholders have not been in vain as the Cabinet has taken all the feedback into consideration in withdrawing the proposal allowing for the conversion of minors to Islam by a single parent," said Jagir who is also the Malaysian Gurdwaras Council president.
In a statement earlier today, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said the Cabinet had decided to withdraw the proposed Bill which was tabled for first reading in parliament last week, to ensure that any religious decision made was fair to all.
Muhyiddin said they wanted to give the government and all stakeholders more time to review the bill holistically. It will be retabled once a consensus has been reached.
Catholic Research Centre director Fr. Clarence Devadass said they hoped that the process of consultation could begin now with the involvement of all relevant parties.
"We are very glad that the government has heard the voice of the people," he said.
Former president of the Kuala Lumpur Catholic Lawyers Society Francis Pereira said the Bill had clearly not promoted national unity in any way.
"We are relieved that the government has decided to withdraw the bill as it had caused anxiety among non-Muslims in Malaysia."
MIC president Datuk G. Palanivel expressed his satisfaction at the Cabinet's decision.
He said the Cabinet had deliberated long and hard before deciding to withdraw it.
"It was a fair move taking into consideration the sensitivities of various stakeholders and groups. MIC still stands by its statement that the consent of both parents are needed for the conversion of children to Islam," Palanivel added. - July 5, 2013

Thursday, July 4, 2013

After Ferrari, Maserati speed into ether, DAP questions AES integrity

KUALA LUMPUR, July 4 — A Ferrari and a Maserati Gran Turismo caused a stir in November after they were reportedly caught topping 200kph by the contentious Automated Enforcement System (AES), but their mysterious disappearance now from the system’s records has raised a DAP lawmaker’s suspicion.
DAP MP Teo Nie Ching today pointed out the wide coverage of the two events by Chinese vernacular press in November last year, which reported the Ferrari as being photographed going 243kph along the North-South Expressway. The Maserati went even faster: 268kph.
She noted that one report had Road Transport Department assistant director of enforcement Ahmad Nasir Abdul Gani had confirming the capture of the speed demons by the AES.
But she added that a written reply to her question in Parliament seeking the outcome of the two cases show that both have now vanished from the records, with officials denying that either incident was ever recorded.
- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/after-ferrari-maserati-outruns-enforcement-dap-questions-aes-integrity#sthash.ZshzqTJk.dpuf

Source: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/after-ferrari-maserati-outruns-enforcement-dap-questions-aes-integrity

Not an act of God, but the folly of zealots - S.Ramakrishnan

JULY 04, 2013
The freedom to practice one's religion is a fundamental liberty enshrined in the Malaysian Constitution. But hardly two months after the 13th general election UMNO is tabling the highly controversial conversion bill despite opposition and reservation from within BN component members. 
The image that the country is trying hard to push, that Malaysia is truly Asia, with a plural and diverse population, is just the diametric opposite of the increased radicalization of UMNO. 
This is truly worrying and the future has a dark horizon looming. 
Umno has once again shown its true colours: that they care two hoots about non-Malays and non-Muslims and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib’s Razak's National Reconciliation effort.
Amending a legislation to legalize the conversion of a minor who has neither free will nor knowledge about the religion he/she has been converted to tantamount to bullying and forcing the issue down the throats of minorities. Under the new legislation, a parent or guardian can convert a minor. 
Allowing even guardians to convert a child is a flagrant abuse of power and is against the free choice option of children. 
Logically, all conversion should be after 18 years old where the person knows and understand what he is going into.
The tabling of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (Federal Territories) Bill 2013 in Parliament last week, which allows only one parent's consent, or that of the guardian, to convert a minor to Islam has been done with no consideration for the feelings and wishes of minorities. 
The consent of both the parents is a must and no two ways about it. 
This is what the cabinet in 2009 decided and why the change now?
Even the Grand Mufti of Egypt Ali Gomaa, one of the most respected Islamic scholars in the world today, wrote under the sub-heading "Freedom of religion in Islam", "The essential question before us is can a person who is Muslim choose a religion other than Islam? The answer is yes, they can, because the Qur'an says, 'Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion,' [Qur'an, 109:6], and, "Whosoever will, let him believe, and whosoever will, let him disbelieve,' [Qur'an, 18:29], and, 'There is no compulsion in religion. 
The right direction is distinct from error' [Qur'an, 2:256]."  But the UMNO leaders with the holier than thou attitude, may not agree with grand mufti of Egypt.
By persisting to table this sensitive and distasteful bill in parliament, UMNO is trying to whip up Malay Muslim chauvinism to instill fear and reprisal on non-Malays for voting Pakatan Rakyat in GE13. 
With large number of young Malays and urban voters supporting Pakatan Rakyat, such tactics by UMNO will only bring their own downfall sooner.
UMNO and their supporters instead of countering fundamentalism are themselves becoming more radicalized. 
The largest and dominant political party is being increasingly insensitive to minorities which does not augur well for the future of Malaysia remaining a land of plural and diverse tolerance or even being truly Asia. 
Malaysians are now turning towards Pakatan Rakyat leaders to bring about the inclusiveness and provide the constitutional guarantees to all citizens. 
Do unto others what you want others do to you.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Hasty laws, nasty consequences - Child Conversion Bill


JULY 02, 2013
Elections can come and go but some things will never change: for one, the deeply flawed and arbitrary manner in which laws are cobbled together in Malaysia.
Take the controversial Section 103 of the Administration of Islamic Law (Federal Territories) Bill. Listening to Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin defend the Bill in the Parliament lobby yesterday was a cringe-worthy experience.
He said that the Cabinet was aware of the objections raised by Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties and non-government organisations and would take it into account in discussions to follow. The Deputy Prime Minister assured all that the Cabinet would be just.
This sounds like a perfect case of putting the cart before the horse. This is how the process of legislation should be done- first a period of consultation and feedback; drawing up a draft of the Bill and circulating it to relevant parties for more feedback and only when there is a consensus of sorts should it be tabled in Parliament.
Muhyiddin and his friends in Cabinet cannot claim to be blind-sided by the furore this amendment has caused.
Upko leader and former Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Bernard Dompok said that he voiced his objections early on the Bill and was surprised that it had made it to Parliament.
Muhyiddin denied that the government was going back on its word by allowing the minor based on the consent of just one parent. This assurance was offered in 2009 by the then de facto Law Minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz in the wake of a controversy of body snatching case and the conversion of children by a father who embraced Islam..
The DPM said that the amendment had to be done in line with a recent court case.
Puzzling reasoning when you consider the fact that Parliament is the highest decision-making body in the land. Not the courts.
Despite any court decision, Parliament  can choose to make law based on public or national interest. That is a parliamentary democracy.
Hurrying through ill-advised legislation is bad but taking cover behind a court decision for ill-advised legislation is shocking.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

2012年9月国会,大马总稽查司报告拖延,为何?


纳兹里:比预算案迟一两週提呈‧总稽查司报告准备就绪

(吉隆坡24日讯)首相署部长拿督斯里纳兹里表示,2011年总稽查司报告已经准备就绪,但不会於本週五(24日)与2013年財政预算案同时间提呈国会,以让国会议员有足够的时间跟进这两份报告。
纳兹里在国会走廊对记者说,以往政府都是在同一天提呈这两份报告,但去年开始便分开提呈,而今年也不例外;两份报告提呈的时间將会相差一至两个星期。
“总稽查司报告已经准备就绪,但不会(和財政预算案)一起提呈,因为稽查报告比財政预算案更多新闻。"“两份报告提呈的时间將会相差一至两个星期。"他说,他们希望国会议员先討论財政预算案,因为总稽查司报告会吸引更多的“注意力"。
2013年財政预算案將会在本週五(28日)提呈国会,这也意味著总稽查司报告將会在10月7至14日之间提呈国会。

预算案与总稽查司报告没同时提呈‧安华:疑有隱议程

(吉隆坡24日讯)反对党议员今日对总稽查司报告没有与財政预算案同时提呈国会表示不满。国会反对党领袖拿督斯里安华说,將財政预算案和总稽查司报告分开提呈是不恰当的,当中似乎有隱藏议程。
安华今日在国会走廊针对首相署部长拿督斯里纳兹里指政府不会在週五提呈財政预算案的同一天提呈总稽查司报告,表示不满。
他认为这样的安排是要转移对政府表现的视线,並指两分报告应该同时提呈国会。
公正党鹅嘜区国会议员阿兹敏也说,他对这样的安排感到惊讶,当中似乎有“隱藏的议程",包括尝试掩盖政府的弱点和滥权。
他说,国会议员是以总稽查司报告的內容作为辩论的基础。
“我们不要用没有根据的指责来辩论,这个报告(总稽查司报告)会显示出政府是否有根据程序和正確的方式,还是当中有涉及滥权。"他表示,既然政府推行政府转型计划,就应该要有开放的作风,而不是用藉口来掩盖政府部门在过去一年的弱点。

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Mat Sabu denies telling Sin Chew PAS will enforce hudud once in power


August 28, 2012
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 28 — PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu denied today a report in Malaysia’s best-selling Chinese vernacular paper quoting him as saying that the party will seek to enforce Islamic penal law should the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) opposition pact take over Putrajaya in the next general election.
Sin Chew Daily had splashed on its front page today a report headlined “PAS will implement hudud if it comes into power”, citing the Islamist party’s No. 2, popularly known as Mat Sabu, as saying he will seek to amend the Federal Constitution to enable the Islamic penal code to be implemented.
Mohamad (picture)told The Malaysian Insider that when he was contacted by a reporter from Sin Chew, he never mentioned the word “hudud” in the telephone conversation.
“When the newspaper reporter contacted me, the word hudud never came out at all.
“Perhaps he does not understand Malay very well,” he told The Malaysian Insider when contacted to confirm the news. 
Mohamad said he had been alerted to the Sin Chew article by several Chinese acquaintances earlier this morning.
He added that he had repeatedly made clear that PAS’s wish to amend the law will be done through the parliamentary process and will not conflict with the Federal Constitution, the supreme law of the land.
“Whatever PAS wishes to do must have PR’s agreement.
“We maintain the agreement that has been agreed upon by all parties in PR,” he said, referring to the common policy framework signed by PAS and its political allies PKR and the DAP when they formed the PR opposition pact shortly after the landmark Election 2008 to counter the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition. 
The three parties had grabbed 82 out of 222 parliamentary seats and 206 out of a total 576 seats in the state assemblies in the 12th general election, the biggest win for the opposition since 1969.
Hudud has long been a thorny issue for the coalition bloc, with the DAP steadfastly opposed to its enforcement in a secular government.
The previous partnership between PAS and the DAP under the Barisan Alternatif tag was broken ahead of the 1999 general election due to disagreements over hudud.
The DAP quit the alliance after PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, who was then Terengganu mentri besar, had announced his party’s plan to set up an Islamic state and carry out hudud. 
PAS’s former deputy president Nasharudin Mat Isa and the DAP chairman Karpal Singh recently took their ideological quarrel over the issue public.
Mohamad’s denial comes on the heels of Kedah MCA chief Datuk Chong Itt Chew who a week ago claimed that he too had been misquoted by a reporter from Malay daily Sinar Harian.
On August 21, the Malay tabloid had published a report titled “MCA Kedah sokong hudud” (Kedah MCA supports hudud) on its front page, quoting Chong as telling political foe the DAP to drop its opposition to hudud law as the Islamic penal code would not affect non-Muslims.
Chong had denied the same day Sinar’s report citing him, saying he had not uttered the word “hudud” in a phone interview with the paper’s reporter and accused the Malay daily of having twisted his words.

Monday, June 11, 2012

Four times of Tear Gas Shells than that were used at Bersih 2.0

Bersih 3.0 Rally was a Peaceful Assembly by participants who only "armed" themselves with salts and water. But it was regretful that the big volumes of weapons that were prepared would mean that BN government was prepared for something. It was a lot of money spent by the police which was absolutely a waste of public funds. But until today the government and the police still denied about police brutality. Nevertheless, the news was known worldwide. Even United Nations has warned the Malaysian authorities.
--------------------------------------------------------

967 tear gas canisters, grenades fired at Bersih protestors



June 11, 2012
File photo of police firing tear gas to disperse the protestors at the April 28 Bersih rally in Kuala Lumpur. — Picture by Choo Choy May

KUALA LUMPUR, June 11 — A total of 909 tear gas canisters and 58 tear gas grenades were used to disperse the tens of thousands who gathered for the April 28 Bersih rally here which has resulted in repeated allegations of police brutality.
The Home Ministry also said in its reply to a parliamentary question by Batu Gajah MP Fong Po Kuan that the government spent RM1.8 million to police the rally for free and fair elections.
The number of tear gas shells fired was nearly four times the 262 used in the previous Bersih rally on July 9, 2011 which resulted in international condemnation for Putrajaya’s clampdown on the electoral reform movement.
But the ministry insisted in a reply to a separate question by the DAP lawmaker that “police acted according to standard operating procedures (SOP) to prevent the situation from becoming more violent and threatening public safety.”
“Police had to act swiftly to ensure the situation was under control,” it said, despite violent clashes between police and protestors lasting for over four hours.
The government has set up a panel to investigate the April 28 violence, but the choice of former national police chief Tun Hanif Omar has been widely criticised after he compared the movement to communism and accused the organisers of an attempted coup.
The rally that saw tens of thousands gather at six different locations in the capital city before heading to the historic Dataran Merdeka was peaceful until about 2.30pm when Bersih chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan asked the crowd to disperse.
But her announcement was not heard by most of the crowd who persisted to linger around the historic square which the court had already barred to the public over the weekend.
Just before 3pm, some protestors breached the barricade surrounding the landmark, leading police to disperse the crowd with tear gas and water cannons.
Police then continued to pursue rally-goers down several streets amid chaotic scenes which saw violence from both sides over the next four hours.
Several dozen demonstrators have claimed that they were assaulted by groups of over 10 policemen at a time and visual evidence appears to back their claim but police also point to violence from rally-goers who attacked a police car.
The police car then crashed into a building before some protestors flipped it on its side.

Friday, May 11, 2012

428 集会逼退选举法修正案


·        伍薪荣
·        2012510 傍晚646


民主行动党全国大选备战委员会秘书伍薪荣指出,内阁撤回备受争议案的2012年选举犯罪修正法案,最主要原因是25万人参与的428“黄绿3.0大集会,为国阵带来前所未有的压力,所以这完全是人民力量的胜利。

他表示,首相署部长纳兹里对内阁决定撤回该法案所给予的理由十分牵强,更暴露了国阵国会议员,当初在国会仓促通过该法案的不负责任行为。

他批评纳兹里表示当初接纳该法案是基于不干预选委会的独立性,而政府也只是扮演邮差的说词,完全是自欺欺人且为国阵自圆其说,因为该法案条文一开始就太具争议性和不公平,民联大力鞭策和作出反对。

他表示,事实上,选委会一直以来都不能秉持公正性和独立性,受制于国阵和没有决心作出改革,致使净选盟提出八大诉求,并在发动3.0大集会时疾呼选委会总辞。

也是行动党全国副组织秘书的伍薪荣在文告中说,就以选委会主席阿都阿兹的个人诚信来说,就已经是一个疑问;阿都阿兹被揭露为巫统党员后并没有第一时间站出来表态,等到纸包住不火了才承认,甚至出动纳兹里缓颊,声称阿都阿兹党籍失效。

不论阿都阿兹有否亲自退党,或所谓的党籍失效,他已不再适合担任选委主席职!

他指出,如果国阵政府有诚意改革和证明它没有干预选委会的运作,就应该即刻落实净选盟提出的八大诉求,特别是清理选民册,让我国民主制度及精神能真正被推崇,公平与公正地让人民在来届大选出属意的政府。

他也提到,一些警员在428大集会采取的野蛮和粗暴行径,已使警方的形象下降,我国的民主进程受到威胁;如今,警方不但发布所谓滋事者的照片,还上门捉人和展开提控行动,让人感到遗憾。

我们的看法是,政府应尊重和平集会者的基本人权。此外,若警方要提控滋事者,那么,涉及使用暴力的警员也应该受到对付。