Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts

Monday, December 15, 2014

马来西亚教育政策导致英文水准每况愈下

2014年12月15日
作者:陈亚伦

    我跟今天的青少年以英语沟通,断定他们的理解能力差劲。马来西亚的确面对英文水准每况愈下的状况。教育部长为此感叹乃无济于事,因为我们在致力于提升它时,只采用治标的政策。当初废除英校,及升中学以马来文取代英文教学,我国其实就注定了为竞争力被削弱付代价。敦马哈迪发觉弊病为时已晚,来一个推行英文教数理政策,实行几年后结果现任教育部长又恢复这两科以马来文教学。我国还花费千万令吉算的费用聘请英国和美国教师。我看不到这政策有什么效果!现在又建议增加上课时间多几小时到下午,部长应该跟教育界团体及家长探讨后才来发言,不然真的让人感到教育政策变化无常!

        学生英文水准差,因为我们绝大多数的英文教师不能掌握英文。有个学生投诉说她的英文老师不能分辨“horse”(马)和“donkey”(驴)!政府不该批评私人公司或跨国企业歧视某种族,因为它们录用职员以能掌握英文为重要条件。每年都有好几万大学生毕业,今年刚毕业了10万人。20年以前,大学毕业生非常吃香。现在,你随便丢一块石头都能打中一个大学毕业生!毕业就是失业,尤其今年开始令人担心,因为原油价跌已经影响我国经济,首当其冲就是外资撤导致股市降及马币贬值,加上4个月后实行消费税,我国的竞争力就被削弱。每一年,大学毕业生因为英文不好而失业,政府又花费另外训练他们,这做法只在大马有(Only In Malaysia),这情况也造成我国大学排行榜在400所大学以外。

    本来读大学就是“有料”的,毕业后应该是帮助别人的,但他们却要国家动用金钱时间帮助!教育是长远的路途,如今的困境,要摆脱的话,最少需要30年,这也断乎于如果敢敢釜底抽薪的话!

Monday, October 17, 2011

Race quotas, politics led to falling UM standards, says World Bank study

October 17, 2011
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 17 — A World Bank publication has found that standards at Universiti Malaya have fallen and the institution has been kept at a disadvantage because of race-based admission quotas and political interference in university management.

In contrast, Singapore’s decision to prioritise research, keeping English as the medium of instruction and a merit-based admissions policy have all contributed to the success of the National University of Singapore’s success, according to “The Road to Academic Excellence,” which studies what contributes to a world-class research university.

The study also noted that Malaysian secondary school students are not well prepared for tertiary education.

It points out that the Malaysian education system promotes rote learning, conformity and uniformity rather than fresh and creative thinking.

The study is led by two scholars — Philip Altbach and Jamil Salmi — while various chapters see contributions from various academics.

Salmi, a Moroccan education economist attached to the World Bank, also notes that “disturbing political developments, from the burning of churches to the whipping of a woman for drinking beer in public,” also cast a shadow on Malaysia’s “image as an open and tolerant society.”

The comparisons between UM and NUS is contained in a chapter entitled “The National University of Singapore and the University of Malaya: Common Roots and Different Paths.”

The chapter is authored by Hena Mukherjee, a former Universiti Malaya department head with a doctorate in education from Harvard University, and Poh Kam Wong, an NUS Business School professor.

According to the study, “at an early stage, the Singapore government realised the universities’ role in sustaining economic growth.

“In contrast, after 1970, UM’s institutional goals reflected the New Economic Policy, an affirmative action plan for ethnic Malays and indigenous groups, put in place in the wake of disastrous 1969 ethnic riots that took the lives of hundreds of people on both sides of the racial divide.,” the study found.

The authors said that apart from the student quota system, the NEP translated into more scholarships to Bumiputeras, special programmes to facilitate their entry into higher education institutions, and the use of the Malay language in place of English in the entire education system by 1983.

“In UM and in government, the policy impact spiralled upward so that Bumiputera staff members, over time, secured almost all senior management, administrative, and academic positions.

“As NUS kept pace with the demands of a growing economy that sought to become competitive internationally, with English continuing as the language of instruction and research, UM began to focus inward as proficiency in English declined in favour of the national language — Bahasa Malaysia — and the New Economic Policy’s social goals took precedence.”

The study noted however that there has been widespread recognition that the implementation of affirmative action policies in Malaysia has hurt the higher education system, sapping Malaysia’s economic competitiveness and driving some (mainly Chinese and Indians) to more meritocratic countries, such as Singapore.

In the broader study, the lead authors found that research was an important element in the making of a world-class university, as well as top-grade talent.

“We’re both convinced that serious research universities are important in almost all societies,” Altbach, who is the director of the Center for International Higher Education at Boston College, told the New York Times last week in an interview.

Said Altbach: “Independence, luck, persistence, some kind of strategic vision, adequate resources — usually, but not always, public resources — good governance structures, good leadership, the ability to attract good students and so on. But we have found that the quality of the faculty is really crucial.”

Salmi, who co-ordinates the World Bank’s activities related to higher education, told the same newspaper of their new 390-page study, which will be released later this month, that their advice is like that supposedly given for a rabbit stew recipe: “First, catch your rabbit.” Only in this case the advice would be: “First, catch your faculty.”

“The difference between a good university and great university comes down to talent.”

Source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/race-quotas-politics-led-to-falling-um-standards-says-world-bank-study/