Showing posts with label Karpal Singh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karpal Singh. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Karpal Singh fined RM4,000 for sedition


 | March 11, 2014
Karpal Singh's remark was made at the height of the Perak political crisis in 2009.
UPDATED
karpalKUALA LUMPUR: The Kuala Lumpur High Court today sentenced lawyer and DAP chairman Karpal Singh to a fine of RM4,000 for sedition.
On Feb 21, the same court had found him guilty of sedition for questioning the Sultan of Perak’s action in removing Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin as the menteri besar of Perak in 2009.
Trial judge Azman Abdullah delivered the sentence today after hearing mitigation from Karpal Singh’s lawyers Ram Karpal Singh, Sanjeet Kaur and Gobind Singh Deo, and from the prosecution.
Justice Azman however did not allow the Bar Council and Lawasia to make submissions for Karpal Singh.
The RM4,000 fine means Karpal Singh can be disqualified as the Bukit Gelugor MP if he fails in his appeal to either overturn the conviction, or to reduce the fine to be below RM2,000.
Wheelchair-bound Karpal Singh, 74, was found guilty of having said at his legal firm in Jalan Pudu Lama on Feb 6, 2009, that the removal of Mohammad Nizar and the appointment of Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir as the new menteri besar by the sultan could be questioned in court.
The charge, under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, provides for a maximum jail term of three years and a fine of RM5,000, or both, upon conviction.
The High Court had, on June 11, 2010, acquitted and discharged Karpal Singh without calling for his defence but, following an appeal by the prosecution, the Court of Appeal, on Jan 20, 2012, ordered him to make his defence.
The court today was filled with Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters.
Shouts of ‘zalim’
Earlier, in mitigation, Karpal Singh’s defence team argued that the politician merely offered a legal opinion and the charge leveled at him was done in bad faith.
Also present at the court today was Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang, Pas deputy president Mohamad Sabu, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar.
Hundreds of Pakatan Rakyat supporters gathered at the court as early as 8am. However the situation remained calm throughout except for one instance when the crowd shouted “zalim” (cruel) when the prosecution sought jail sentence for Karpal Singh.
The court’s decision has since received heavy criticism from lawyers and pro human rights group.
Previously, Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) depicted the decision as the return of authoritarianism and political persecution.
The group expressed shock over the conviction as they strongly believed that it was not a crime to make critical comments.
Lawyer Syahredzan Johan also pointed out that what Karpal Singh had said in regards to Sultan Azlan Shah’s decision to remove Nizar Jamaluddin as the Perak Menteri Besar in 2009 was merely an opinion from a legal expert.
Meanwhile, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) said in a press statement that Karpal Singh’s conviction sent a message that lawyers in Malaysia were not free to express their opinion on legal issues before condemning the conviction saying it was inconsistent with international law.
Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/03/11/karpal-singh-fined-rm4000-for-sedition/

Monday, March 10, 2014

Barisan Nasional has miscalculated the price in jailing Anwar

Anwar Ibrahim’s conviction: A travesty of justice – Jose Mario Dolor De Vega

I refer to “Judicial process and timing in Anwar’s case implies persecution not prosecution, says Bar Council”, The Malaysian Insider, March 9 concerning the latest conviction of the Malaysian opposition leader.
I overwhelmingly concur with the charge of the Malaysian Bar Council that “the charge against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and the manner in which his appeal was handled fuels the perception that the opposition leader was persecuted and not prosecuted”.
It is undeniable that because of the grave fear and extreme paranoia of the powers that be to the natural and charismatic power and genuine popularity of Anwar to the Malaysian public, they have used all the resources and arsenal of the government even to the point of compromising the integrity and independence of the courts.
Why? For the simple reason that they do not want Anwar to win in Kajang and subsequently be the Selangor menteri besar.
I am wondering, is it all worth it? Yes, they successfully blocked Anwar from contesting in the coming by-election. In fact, he is in danger once again of going back to prison, yet do they know the repercussions and consequences of what they did?
It is my ardent view and so held that even if PKR will put a dog or a rooster or a cat as its candidate for Kajang, that animal will win not only handsomely but with a landslide.
The deputy director of Asia division of Human Rights, Phil Robertson, said that Anwar’s trial “was all about knocking him out of politics and the government was prepared to do whatever it took to make that happen”.
In other words, they are delirious and desperate to stop Anwar at all cost!
The nefarious act of the powers that be, their continuing persecution of Anwar and his family that begun 15 years ago and all the evil methods that they’ve utilised just to silence the Opposition Leader, will return like a tsunami and will explode in their very faces one fine day!
They will be hurt tremendously by their foolishness! The people are angry and their collective wrath in time will erupt! Watch out!
I am equally in agreement with the contention of the Bar president, Christopher Leong specifically, when he said “that in the first place, the archaic provision under the Penal Code which criminalises sodomy and oral sex should never have been brought against Anwar”.
Leong unequivocally asserted that:
"The case has unnecessarily taken up judicial time and public funds, and has muddied the waters of our justice system.
"We also have grave misgivings with respect to the manner and timing in which the appeal was handled, especially over the way in which mitigation and sentencing proceeded… "
On Friday, the Court of Appeals overturned the Kuala Lumpur High Court’s January 9, 2012 decision acquitting Anwar and declared him guilty of sodomy.
The decision of the court in my view is not only a travesty of justice but an extreme mockery of the whole administration of justice. This leads the wife of the Opposition Leader, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail to lament that:
“The proceedings had been conducted in the Palace of Justice, but inside there was only injustice.”
Judgment of Acquittal that is reviewable
Another thing that confused me since then, up to now is the stupid and idiotic principle of the Malaysian “legal” concept of reviewing the judgment of acquittal!
In many jurisdictions, once a person is acquitted he or she is immediately discharged and he or she will no longer be prosecuted (again) on the same charge, because it will violate the legal doctrine of Double Jeopardy which is a universally sanctioned and recognised legal principle.
Right or wrong, a judgment of acquittal is unappealable, irreversible and final, but in Malaysia, even if you are already acquitted, a higher court can still reverse the judgment of your acquittal. I believe that this principle or policy or practice is not only unfavourable to the accused but also mocks the very definition of due process.
So, in Malaysia for example, if an individual is acquitted, he or she cannot celebrate his or her vindication, because he or she must wait whether or not the prosecutor (which in truth and in fact must be called as the persecutor) will decide to appeal his or her judgment of acquittal!
This is preposterously unjust, hilarious to the maximum and stupid to the core, to say the least! Undeniably, this is the heights of absurdity and grave injustice! Shame!
Consider the following facts as reported by the Malaysian Insider:
“Court of Appeal registry had informed Anwar's lawyers to reserve April 7 to 10 as the proposed hearing dates, to which the team agreed.
“However, these dates were abandoned and replaced with earlier dates.”
Question:
I am wondering why the court is acting like it is following a script or a schedule! Why the rush and the haste?
Leong further added that:
"If this is true, it raises the question as to why the Court of Appeal brought forward the appeal to be heard when the April dates had been agreed on.
"After all the defendant was facing a possible 20-year jail term and the April dates would have given the legal team more time to prepare… "
The worst part of this fiasco in my view is the fact that the court had only taken approximately 90 minutes to consider before giving a unanimous decision in reversing the acquittal by the High Court and then when Anwar’s lead counsel, Karpal Singh and the defence team sought an adjournment until next week to allow them to prepare for mitigation the court refused it flatly and one justice even ordered Karpal to submit the mitigation in one hour’s time.
Of course, this farce led Anwar to react angrily. He stood up and shouted, "Do it now!"
Indeed, as Leong quipped: "these matters raise many questions, cause much speculation, and lend to the perception that justice may have been hijacked… ”
Commentaries:
Imagine the scenario the Opposition Leader’s acquittal two years ago was overturned, while his lead counsel, Karpal was also convicted of sedition a month ago.
Wow! I am wondering what kind of judicial system now is being practice in Malaysia and what kind of administration of justice are they following?
Anwar is convicted, Karpal is convicted; I am inclined to ask? It is Tian Chua’s turn to be convicted? Hullabaloo, it seems to be that the powers that be are convicting all the opposition leaders!
These convictions and outrageous trials clearly shows that the establishment is compose of power-hungry despots and they will not stop from wiping out the true people’s representatives!
Yes, these men are convicted; it is because they are men of conviction and principle.
This is a shame, a farce and grim day for all Malaysians!
Local and International condemnation of Anwar’s “conviction”
As already noted, the people of Malaysia are angry with the decision which they viewed as a miscarriage of justice.
Besides the Malaysian Bar, Lawyer’s for Liberty, Bersih and other non-government organisations have also come out to question and criticize the said decision.
The international community’s reaction is more stringent and categorical to the core, to say the least.
The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) condemned Anwar’s conviction as a mockery of justice and they even directly “casts doubts on the independence and impartiality of the Malaysian judiciary and tarnishes the reputation of the country’s legal system”.
Even the United States voiced its concern through State Department spokeswoman, Jen Psaki when she stated that:
"The decision to prosecute Mr Anwar, and his trial, have raised a number of concerns regarding the rule of law and the independence of the court…
"In this high-profile case, it is critical for Malaysia to apply the rule of law fairly, transparently and apolitically in order to promote confidence in Malaysia's democracy and judiciary."
Warning to the powers that be and a call to the people
We all know and so as the whole knows that this is an extreme travesty of justice! If the establishment thought and that colluding stupid “court” thinks that by jailing the opposition leader they will silence him; they are dead wrong! Anwar is used to being in jail!
This latest judicial perversity and political prostitution of the powers that be will only empower further the rakyat not only to resist, but inevitably to revolt!
It is beyond the shadow of doubt that this is exactly the time for them, the people themselves to act and to rise.
They must show in a collective sense that the true power of the government lies on their hands. They must now launch and unleash the Malaysian people power in its full force!
HIDUP RAKYAT!
REFORMASI 2.0!
ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!! – March 10, 2014.
* Jose Mario Dolor De Vega is a philosophy lecturer at the College of Arts and Letters, Polytechnic University of the Philippines.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.
Source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/sideviews/article/anwar-ibrahims-conviction-a-travesty-of-justice-jose-mario-dolor-de-vega

Friday, March 7, 2014

Anwar given 5 years’ jail after appellate court reverses sodomy acquittal

PUTRAJAYA, March 7 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was today sentenced to five years’ jail after the Court of Appeal overturned his previous sodomy acquittal, ruling that the trial judge erred in rejecting DNA evidence adduced.
The three-men bench led by Datuk Balia Yusof Wahi, Datuk Aziah Ali and Datuk Mohd Zawawi Salleh unanimously decided that the High Court failed to “critically evaluate” the evidence submitted by government chemist Dr Seah Lay Hong.
The bench delivered their decision in 90 minutes after hearing submissions from both parties in yesterday and today.
Balia said that High Court Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah had wrongly concluded that investigating officer Jude Blacious Pereira may have compromised DNA samples submitted as evidence when he opened a sealed bag in which they were kept.
“We are of the view that had the learned judge properly and correctly appreciated that the so-called tampering was solely to P27 (the bag containing the test tubes holding the samples), he would not have come to the conclusion that by cutting open P27, the confidence and integrity of the samples was gone and the samples had been compromised before they reached PW5 (Dr Seah) for analysis,” Balia said.


Balia also dismissed the defence’s contention that the DNA samples had suffered no degradation despite being retrieved from the rectum of Anwar’s accuser, given the “impeccable credentials” of the government chemists.
“We unanimously allow this appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court. The respondent is hereby found guilty and convicted of the offence charged,” read Balia.
Anwar’s defence team then sought for an adjournment until next week to allow them to prepare for mitigation.
But Balia today insisted that Karpal Singh, who is leading Anwar’s defence, must submit mitigating circumstances in an hour’s time.
This led Anwar to react angrily by standing up and shouting out at the decision.
“Just do it now!” he exclaimed loudly, in apparent reference to the sentencing.
This prompted his tearful wife, Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, along with daughter Nurul Izzah Anwar to rush to his side in an attempt to calm the opposition leader.
Karpal said that the defence was not prepared to mitigate the sentence, but Umno lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah who headed the prosecution objected to say the government’s appeal has been postponed since July last year.
Protests could also be heard from the gallery when Balia said that mitigation must be completed today.
“Why are you trying to rush?” an unidentified speaker asked loudly as a tense air descended over the courtroom.
“It’s [happening] all over again, after 15 years. They want to put me in the lockup. That’s why they want to go ahead with the mitigation,” Anwar said today, referring to his first sodomy conviction in 1999.
The opposition leader has repeatedly claimed that the charge is politically motivated.
Just before the proceedings were about to resume more than a dozen police officers filed into the courtroom that was already packed with reporters, MPs, party members and supporters.
As the session resumed, Karpal told judges that Anwar suffers from “serious ailments” such high blood pressure, heart condition and a spinal problem, and that the defence needed time to prepare Anwar’s medical report before mitigating the sentencing.
But Balia concurred with Shafee that a medical report is not pertinent and it can be dealt with later, which prompted Karpal to question the “necessity to rush this case.”
“Under the circumstances of this case, a medical report is not necessary,” said Balia and asked Karpal to continue with the mitigation.
Balia then asked Shafee to proceed to state the appropriate punishment for the charge.
“The victim was 23-years-old at the time the offence was committed. He was employed by the accused.
“To add insult to the injury, the accused had called the victim a liar. No condom was used, no regard to sexually transmitted diseases. It was an irresponsible and dangerous act,” said Shafee.

This prompted Anwar to shout from the dock: “Sudahlah (Enough) Shafee, you have got what you wanted.”
Citing Anwar’s role as the parliamentary opposition leader, an adviser to the Selangor government and to-be candidate in Kajang, Shafee said the punishment accorded should be appropriate with the offence committed.
Shafee also said Anwar’s case was an issue of “national security”.
After consultation with the other judges, Balia handed down the sentence of five years’ imprisonment.
Balia then set RM10,000 as bail and instructed Anwar to make the payment on Monday.
On January 9, 2012, Anwar was acquitted of allegedly sodomising Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan at the Desa Damansara condominium on June 26, 2008.
High Court judge Mohd Zabidin had then freed Anwar on grounds that he could not rule out possible tampering of the DNA samples in the case.
The opposition leader was charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping upon conviction.
The trial began 18 months after Anwar was charged in court in August 2008.
The former deputy prime minister and finance minister was charged with sodomy and corruption in 1998 after he was sacked from the cabinet. He was convicted and jailed for both offences but the sodomy charge was overturned.
Anwar was freed in September 2004 after spending six years in jail and rose to limelight by winning back his Permatang Pauh parliamentary seat in a by-election in 2008, which he defended in May 5 national polls. 
Source: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/anwar-acquittal-reversed

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Anwar should have been acquitted without defence called in sodomy case, says Karpal

BY V. ANBALAGAN
MARCH 06, 2014
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should have been acquitted of sodomy without his defence being called as the case investigating officer failed to follow the directive of a Kuala Lumpur hospital forensic pathologist in the handling of samples retrieved from Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, the Court of Appeal was told today.
Lawyer Karpal Singh (pic) said Dr Siew Shue Feng had instructed Superintendent Judy Blacious Pereira to store 12 samples in a freezer before passing them over to a chemist.
"The integrity of the samples was compromised as Pereira kept them in a filing cabinet in his office, instead of a freezer," he said in his submission.

Dr Siew had handed over the samples, including rectal swabs, collected from Saiful for DNA tests.
The appellate court was hearing Putrajaya's appeal against Anwar's acquittal on a charge of sodomising Saiful, his former aide, at a condominium unit in Bukit Damansara in 2008.
Karpal said the Inspector General of Police's standing order did not state that an investigating officer could remove samples from a bag and put them in separate envelopes before labelling them.
He said the samples were collected at the hospital some 56 hours after the alleged incident, and the police officer only handed them another 40 hours later to government
chemist Dr Seah Lay Hong about 7.30pm on June 30, 2008.
Karpal said the defence had challenged Dr Seah, as the integrity of the samples were compromised and the prosecution had failed to establish a prime facie case.
He said the trial judge believed the testimony of two defence expert witnesses over the two local chemists, including Dr Seah.
"That is the reason the judge decided to acquit Anwar after hearing the testimony of the two foreign experts," he added.
On January 9, 2012, Anwar, now 66, was acquitted for sodomising his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan at a condominium unit in Bukit Damansara in 2008.
Putrajaya is appealing against that decision.
He also said the court must disregard the evidence of Saiful, as his conduct after the alleged incident showed he could have left the apartment as the door was not latched.
"But he had curry puff and coffee with Anwar and remained in the apartment for 20 minutes before leaving," he said.
The lawyer told the court even in the first sodomy case, the Federal Court acquitted Anwar after discarding the evidence of complainant Azizan Abu Bakar due to lack of credibility.
Ram Karpal Singh, who is assisting Karpal, said Dr Seah's DNA analysis showed there was a third contributor found in the lower, upper and perianal region of samples collected from Saiful.
The other were that of Anwar and Saiful.
"Perhaps, Saiful was penetrated by a third party," Ram Karpal said.
He said since the samples were handed to Dr Seah 96 hours later, there was a high possibility of them being in a state of degradation.
However, he said the defence had shown the samples were surprisingly pristine.
"Now is it doubtful whether the sample that was collected from Saiful was the one that was sent for analysis," he added.
Hearing was adjourned till tomorrow.
Earlier, Karpal went on a tirade  against ad-hoc deputy public prosecutor Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah for character assassination of Anwar.
Karpal, who is also DAP national chairman, said the Umno lawyer had been making remarks against the opposition leader for his statement in the dock at the High Court.
Shafee, during submission early today, said Anwar's defence in the High Court was bare denial when the PKR de facto chief only gave a statement from the dock.
"He attacked a judge, the prosecution and the government when he gave the unsworn statement," Shafee said.
He said it was elementary law that an accused person had the option to testify and be cross-examined, remain silent or give an unsworn statement.
Karpal said he had been patient and did not want to disrupt Shafee for more than two and half hours when the lawyer laced his submission with political statements.
Training his comments at the Court of Appeal judges, the veteran lawyer said this court must decide this case based on evidence.
"Any submission must be within the parameters of the law," he said in the packed court room, mostly consisting of PKR supporters.
He said Shafee was misleading the court when he said that the standard of proof in criminal cases was on the balance of probability, lower than the beyond reasonable doubt test.
Shafee nor the three-men bench chaired by Datuk Balia Yusof Wahi interrupted Karpal when the 73-year-old wheelchair-bound politician-cum-lawyer made the remarks, at times in a loud and stern voice.
He said in a criminal trial it was the prosecution who had the responsibility to prove every ingredient of the charge.
"An accused person need not prove his innocence," Karpal said in apparent reference to Shafee's submission that the prosecution could not cross examine Anwar in the High Court because he gave a statement from the dock. -- March 6, 2014
Source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/anwar-should-have-been-acquitted-without-defence-called-in-sodomy-case-says

Saturday, February 22, 2014

International law experts say Karpal’s conviction violates freedom of speech

BY V. ANBALAGAN, ASSISTANT NEWS EDITOR
FEBRUARY 22, 2014
LATEST UPDATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2014 05:58 PM
The ICJ, together with other Malaysian legal bodies, disapprove of the High Court's decision in convicting Karpal of sedition. – The Malaysia Insider pic, February 22, 2014. The ICJ, together with other Malaysian legal bodies, disapprove of the High Court's decision in convicting Karpal of sedition. – The Malaysia Insider pic, February 22, 2014.The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) has joined the Malaysian legal fraternity in disapproving the High Court's decision in convicting lawyer Karpal Singh of sedition, saying the conviction was inconsistent with international law and standards on the free expression of opinion by lawyers.
ICJ's International Legal Advisor on Southeast Asia Emerlynne Gil said this conviction sends out a message that lawyers in Malaysia are not free to express their opinions about legal issues.
Gil said Karpal's conviction was based on the fact that during a press conference in early 2009, he had allegedly uttered "seditious words" when he questioned whether Sultan Azlan Shah had the legal authority to remove the then Perak Menteri Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin.
"This case is another sign of the lack of respect of the Malaysian government for the principle of free expression," said Gil in a statement.
She said Karpal acted in fulfilment of a core function of the legal profession, which is to contribute to the public discourse on matters of law.
The United Nations basic principles on the role of lawyers specifically provide that lawyers, like ordinary citizens, are entitled to freedom of opinion and expression.
She said lawyers have the right "to take part in public discussion of matters concerning the law, the administration of justice and the promotion and protection of human rights" without fear of suffering professional restrictions or repercussions due to their lawful action.
Meanwhile, the Malaysian Bar said the right of a citizen, and in this case, a senior and experienced lawyer to voice an opinion on a constitutional point of law, was clearly within the scope of the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under the Federal Constitution.
"That constitutional right must be interpreted liberally while any limits on it should be interpreted narrowly," Bar vice-president Steven Thiru said in a statement.
He said the constitution allowed Putrajaya to make laws, including the Sedition Act, that limited the right to free speech; but stressed that such laws "must be interpreted restrictively to ensure that the fundamental right was not rendered meaningless".
Steven said the sedition law enacted in 1948 was an "affront to the rule of law" and designed to suppress and persecute the citizens.
"The Act is antithetical to democratic principles and ideals as it stifles and criminalises genuine, temperate and reasonable discussions of important national issues," said Thiru, whose organisation represents about 13,000 lawyers in the peninsula.
Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) executive director Eric Paulsen said Karpal's conviction reaffirms the return of authoritarianism and political persecution.
Paulsen said this was apparent following the dismissal earlier this week of P. Uthayakumar's appeal, also for sedition.
He said the return of authoritarianism and political persecution followed a brief lull during which Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak made a series of democratic reforms which turned out to be a rebranding exercise and ultimately – false.
Yesterday, High Court judge Datuk Paduka Azman Abdullah found Karpal guilty of uttering seditious words against the Sultan of Perak at the height of the constitutional crisis in 2009.
The sentence has been deferred to March 7 for Karpal's defence team to prepare mitigation to obtain a lighter sentence.
Under section 4(1) of the 1948 Sedition Act, Karpal now faces a fine of up to RM 3,000 or imprisonment of up to three years.
The conviction may force Karpal to give up his seat as a member of the Malaysian parliament as the constitution stated that an elected representative was disqualified from office if fined more than RM 2,000 or jailed for a term exceeding one year.
Karpal, 73, has provided legal defence in several high profile cases, including that of opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, whose trial on charges of sodomy had drawn heavy criticism in Malaysia and internationally. – February 22, 2014.
Source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/karpals-conviction-shows-lawyers-arent-free-to-express-opinions-on-law-say

Thursday, September 26, 2013

‘PCA amendments obnoxious, unconstitutional’

Leven Woon

 | September 26, 2013
DAP chairman finds the Prevention of Crime Act (PCA) Amendments Bill which allows detention of suspect without trial for a maximum of two years as unconstitutional.
KUALA LUMPUR: DAP leaders today labelled the Prevention of Crime Act (PCA) Amendment Bill as “obnoxious” and “unconstitutional.”
DAP chairman Karpal Singh said he found the Bill – if passed would allow detention without trial and denying a detainee to right to a judicial review – absurd as it would grant a three-men board the discretion to detain a suspect, provided with evidence.
“How can these people be entrusted with the task of deciding if there is sufficient evidence? If there is enough evidence, why not the authorities haul the suspect to the open court instead?” he asked.
“Let it be heard in the court. If he is found guilty, put him in jail,” he told reporters at the Parliament lobby today.
Karpal was commenting on proposed sections 7B and 7C of the Bill which provided that the board can detain a person who has committed two or more serious offences without trial, if an inquiry report informed that there was sufficient evidence.
Another section of the Bill also provided that a suspect would not able to file for a judicial review as the board’s decision cannot be challenged in court.
Home Ministry tabled the Bill in Parliament yesterday with the House scheduled to debate on the Bill on Monday amid concerns that the passing of the Bill would lead to abuse by the powers-that-be.
“We are doing something unconstitutional as it is against the internal declaration of human rights. The denial of the detainee’s right to seek judicial review has made it worst,” he said,  adding that laws on detention without trial should only be used during wartime.
Agreeing with Karpal, DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang called the proposed PCA amendment an, “obnoxious piece of legislation.”
“It is against the Prime Minister’s transformation and liberalisation promises,” he said.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Karpal says Jui Meng’s intentions ‘suspect’ in Johor DAP-PKR spat


February 18, 2013
KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 18 – Karpal Singh urged today for intervention from Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and an inquiry into Johor DAP chief Dr Boo Cheng Hau’s claims that ex-MCA leader Datuk Chua Jui Meng has been organising an underground campaign against the DAP in the southern state.
The DAP chairman(picture) appeared, however, to back his fellow party leader in the crossfire, calling Dr Boo “the real McCoy” and in contrast, saying Chua’s credibility as Johor’s PKR chief was “suspect”.
“The credibility of Chua Jui Meng is suspect,” Karpal said in a sharply-worded statement here.
“His long sojourn in the MCA and by extension in the Barisan Nasional (BN), his unsuccessful attempt in 2004 at the MCA presidency and his obvious overzealous enthusiasm to regain a seat in Parliament certainly exposes a credibility problem which may appear to consume the better part of his intellect,” added the well-known lawyer.
Chua, a former health minister, was previously a veteran MCA leader, holding the post of vice-president from 1990 until 2004. He made two attempts at MCA’s presidency but lost both times and in an about-turn in 2009, defected to PKR.
In July 2010, he was appointed to the post of Johor PKR chief.
But an unimpressed Karpal told Chua that a politician who “deserts his own political mother” could not be regarded with approval or prided.
He said that if Dr Boo’s allegation that Chua has been the “black hand” behind a campaign against DAP in Johor were true, the latter must be checked in his tracks as soon as possible.
“An in-depth inquiry ought to be launched to determine who are behind the ‘vicious anonymous attacks’ against the DAP and also determine the ‘black hand’ behind these attacks,” Karpal said.
“The assertion by Dr Boo cannot be dismissed out of hand in the interests of the Pakatan Rakyat (PR).
“I call upon PKR de facto leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, to intercede so that PR’s chances in its front line state will not in any way be negatively affected by any act of sabotage,” he added.
In a statement earlier today, Dr Boo urged PKR to drop Chua as its Johor chief and replace latter with either Anwar or PKR president Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.
He argued that since Chua took over the reigns of Johor PKR, the latter’s leadership has been “detrimental” to Johor PR’s unity.
“In actual truth, Johor PR had had cordial inter-party relationships and effective in resolving seats negotiation at the state level previously before Datuk Chua Jui Meng joined the PR,” he said in a statement here.
Dr Boo alleged that while DAP and PAS have been working together on seat distribution in the state, it has been Chua who has been acting like “an absolute monarch” within Johor PR by vetoing all agreements made by the two parties.
“As a newcomer in the PR, Datuk Chua Jui Meng is urged to respect the history of cordial and close relationship between Johor PR component parties in the past.
“Datuk Chua Jui Meng has deliberately been quoted to have said that PKR is the sole PR party ever contesting in Gelang Patah in 2004 and 2008 by deleting the past history as to how DAP Johor stood in Gelang Patah and whole-heartedly supported a great man like Razak Ahmad,” he said in the statement.
Chua is believed to have his sights set on contesting in the Gelang Patah parliamentary seat in the coming polls.
Source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/karpal-says-jui-mengs-intentions-suspect-in-johor-dap-pkr-spat/

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

卡巴星:问题连问3次遭回答“不”,“纳吉缺邱吉尔智慧”


  • 檳岛市议员哈宾达星(左)重播纳吉在檳州国阵新春团拜上被群眾回应“不"的网络视频后,卡巴星认为纳吉缺乏睿智,不应该连问同样的问题多达三次。(图:星洲日报)
(檳城12日讯)民主行动党主席卡巴星认为,首相拿督斯里纳吉没有在檳州国阵新春团拜上见机行事,未把负面的回应转成正面,还问了同样的问题(你们准备接受国阵了吗?)多达3次,造成群眾有充足的机会反击。
他说,纳吉缺乏英国名相已故邱吉尔的睿智,在观眾已经答了一次(向国阵说)“不"后,没有即时扭转形势,反而让观眾有机会连答3次“不"。
“既然纳吉想要从人民口中知道答案,人民也给了很明確的答案,就是拒绝国阵(统治的政府)。即使纳吉承诺在檳州兴建单轨火车、交替公路等,却无法掳取人民支持民联的决心。"
卡巴星今日在檳城亚依淡举行新闻发佈会后,引用邱吉尔在第二世界大战后,以国家英雄姿態参加大选的故事,指邱吉尔上门向一名老妇人拜票时,后者以“我寧可投票给魔鬼也不选你"回应邱吉尔。
“当时,邱吉尔对老妇人说了一句`如果您的好朋友没参选的话,希望您可以把选票投给我’。结果,老妇人对邱吉尔改观,最后把选票给了邱吉尔。"
纳吉昨日出席檳州国阵主办的“一马新春大团拜"时,在致词中询问在场约6万名观眾“你们准备迎接(韩国巨星)PSY出场了吗?"多达三次,观眾都高喊“Yes!"(是),当纳吉继续问了三次“你们准备接受国阵了吗?",皆得到观眾高声回应“No!"(不)。
不同意安华任首相?
“伊党长老会没宣佈"
当记者询及伊党长老协商理事会不同意安华任首相课题时,卡巴星说,长老协商理事会没有正式宣佈,包括身为理事会主席的聂阿兹,已在昨日澄清长老协商理事会没反对安华任首相的消息。
他强调,民联一旦在大选后拿下中央政权,行动党绝对支持(公正党顾问)安华担任首相;同时,伊斯兰党仍然是行动党的可靠合作伙伴。
另一方面,卡巴星重申,民联三党已於上月8日的会议,在非穆斯林能否使用“阿拉"字眼上达致共识,国阵领袖没有必要继续炒作。
当时,伊党主席哈迪阿旺说,伊斯兰教不阻止其他宗教信徒使用“阿拉"字眼,儘管其意思与可兰经原文不符。
年初三现身亚依淡
卡巴星引来游客合照
卡巴星平时光顾的茶室仍休业,他的新闻发佈会是前往另一家茶室召开。卡巴星在大年初三在亚依淡地区现身,令许多前往极乐寺的外州游客感到惊讶。
大多数游客见到卡巴星,主动与卡巴星握手、合照,同时献上新年贺语,更直言支持行动党,让卡巴星笑不拢嘴。
来源:http://news.sinchew.com.my/node/277873?tid=1

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

People turn down Barisan Nasional ‘Gangnam Style’


Athi Shankar
 | February 12, 2013
DAP chairman Karpal Singh says the thousands who attended the BN-sponsored Chinese New Year open house came to watch only Psy.
GEORGE TOWN: The thousands who turned out at the Barisan Nasional Chinese New Year open house here yesterday came to watch South Korean sensation Psy perform his “Opah Gangnam Style” hit and not to show support for BN.
DAP chairman Karpal Singh said (based on the response to the Psy show) Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak should know by now that the majority of Malaysians have rejected BN.
He said the thousands who thronged the state BN-sponsored open house in Han Chiang College came just to watch Psy.
He added that Najib should have realised the people have rejected BN’s 55-year rule “Gangnam Style” when they screamed “No” thrice when he asked them: “Are you ready for BN?”
Instead, the crowd screamed “Yes” thrice when Najib asked: “Are you ready for Psy?”
Karpal said the crowd’s “Big No” to BN was a public vote of no confidence in the ruling coalition.
He added that the incident showed Najib is not a smart prime minister as he should have avoided repeating his question after hearing a resounding “No” in his first attempt.
“The crowd was not only from Penang but from all over the country. Najib wanted the people’s approval for BN, but they did not give him.
“He asked for it,” Karpal, the Bukit Gelugor MP, told reporters here today.
He recalled that former British premier, the late Winston Churchill, was a smart politician in converting a negative situation into something positive.
In the immediate post-World War II general election, Karpal said Churchill, who was campaigning, had stopped by a woman and asked for her vote.
The woman told Churchill: “I rather vote for the devil than you.”
But a shrewd Churchill replied: “In case your good friend [the devil] doesn’t stand [in the election], you vote for me.”
Karpal said Churchill showed political wisdom in changing a negative situation into a positive one, adding that the woman eventually changed her mind and voted for Churchill.
“Churchill was definitely smarter than Najib,” he said.
Karpal also hit out at BN leaders for attempting to exploit the issue of who would be the prime minister if Pakatan Rakyat comes to power.
He said the DAP’s choice was Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim because he was the most qualified and best suited to head the government and lead the country.
He said that PAS’ highest decision-making body, the Syura Council, did not make any official decision to reject Anwar as Pakatan’s prime minister.
“The DAP expects PAS to ultimately endorse Anwar as the prime minister,” he said, adding that BN was exploiting the matter, like the “Allah” issue, to confuse the people.
Source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/02/12/people-reject-bn-gangnam-style/

Sunday, December 16, 2012

行动党代表大会:卡巴星重申挺安华当首相,“火箭伊党仍是好盟友"


  • 行动党第十六届全国党员代表大会在檳城国际体育竞技场举行。(图:星洲日报)
1 of 3
(檳城15日讯)民主行动党主席卡巴星肯定伊斯兰党,强调行动党与伊党之间虽然有意见,但仍是好盟友!
他说,即將来临的全国大选,是民联迈向布城的最好时机,行动党、伊斯兰党及人民公正党此刻必须紧密且真诚地合作,確保这场战役中的对手——国阵,最终会被击退。
他坦言,当初从未想过会有一天和伊党成为同阵线的盟友,不过,隨著国內政治生態与局势的改变,行动党要是没有顺势走上与伊党合作之路,势必会被时代潮流所离弃,失去执政与改变大马的良机。
卡巴星今日在行动党第16届代表大会上强调,伊党是行动党重要的盟友,虽然彼此偶有意见,却不影响合作。
讚伊党坚守原则
他更盛讚伊党亦是一个有原则,並且愿意坚守原则的政党。
“政治上没有永远的朋友,亦没有永远的敌人,可是,不能没有永远的原则。伊党是坚守原则的政党,行动党也是如此。"
他说,有些人批评行动党在执政后逐渐失去原则,事实上这並不正確,他们一直谨守原则,也不准备改变原则。
他重申,一旦民联在大选中胜出,行动党仍会坚持力挺拿督斯里安华成为新任首相,此志不渝。
吁警方深入调查蒙女案
另一方面,卡巴星呼吁警方深入调查蒙古女郎案件,並说若有必要,首相拿督斯里纳吉也必须回答警方提问。
他不吝讚赏行动党在檳城执政后,展现一片新气象,在秘书长林冠英的带领下,出现了一支高效率的政府,为檳州做出许多贡献。
提醒党员饮水思源
“今天来檳城开会,大家可以顺道看看这里的改变。"
他也呼吁来自全国各地的党员代表善用手中一票,打造强大的行动党。
“强大的行动党来自强大的中委会,大家必须好好地利用这重要的一票。"
他提醒,行动党党员不能沉溺於今日的荣耀之中,大家必须饮水思源,如果没有一群前辈,诸如曾敏兴、林吉祥等人付出血汗,不会有今天的行动党。
贏官司不必宰羊庆祝
刚贏得《马来西亚前锋报》誹谤官司的卡巴星,对於吉隆坡高庭裁定该报支付5万令吉赔偿一事,他笑说不必宰羊庆祝,只需在大选宰掉国阵。
“我们今天的大会还是一样欢迎各媒体,《马来西亚前锋报》也有记者来採访。没关係,他们如果继续说话,我们就继续`赚更多的钱’!"
他强调,如果民联执政,国內不会再有谎话连篇的媒体,只会有负责任的媒体。
来源:http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/271781?tid=1

地毯商人指控纳吉,卡巴星报警促彻查


(檳城15日讯)武吉牛汝莪国会议员卡巴星今天向警方报案,要求警方介入调查地毯商人迪巴在接受网络媒体访问时对首相拿督斯里纳吉作出的指控。
卡巴星说,根据刑事法典202条文,如果任何人知道一起涉及刑事的案件就有责任报警要警方深入调查,因此他履行国会议员的责任,报警要求警方调查。
“这是很严重的指控,警方必须调查迪巴的谈话。”
也是行动党主席的卡巴星今天下午在出席行动党全国党员代表大会开幕后,前往邻近的惹兰丁雅警察局报警。
蒲种国会议员哥宾星则希望总检察署能够有所行动,不应该保持缄默。
陪同卡巴星前往报警的包括了其另一名儿子柑仔园州议员佳日星、雪州行政议员刘天球等。
来源:http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/271862?tid=1

行动党代表大会:林吉祥父子第一第二高票当选


  • 行动党新届中委会成员在成绩公佈后合照。前坐者为卡巴星,后左起:倪可汉、刘镇东、巫程豪、陆兆福、方贵伦、林吉祥、哥宾星、林冠英、郭素沁、古拉、张健仁、陈国伟、潘俭伟、章瑛、倪可敏、邓章钦、伍薪荣、张念群。(曹观友提前离开,不在照片中)
(檳城15日讯)行动党第十六届全国代表大会改选没有爆冷,林吉祥和林冠英两父子再次以第一及第二高票当选,分別获得1千607票及1千576票。
卡巴星1411票排名第三党主席卡巴星则获1千411票,排名第三。
计票5个小时半后,行动党改选成绩於在今晚8时45分左右出炉。
中选的20名候选人多数是上届执委,但教人意外的是,党元老陈胜尧仅取得802票,以微差票数被挤出中委会。
其他落选的行动党领导人还有檳州第二副首长拿督拉玛沙米和雪州行政议员刘天球。
值得关注的是,新一届的票选中委会没有任何马来党员中选。前届中委阿末顿只得三百多票。
刘镇东和张念群这两位新一代领袖,则成功躋身核心领导阵容。
霹雳州主席倪可汉以824票,以最低票进入中委会。
来源:http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/271836?tid=1

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

林冠英:万人出席振林山行动党晚宴,“勿错过改朝换代”


  • 李毅平(左)献上鲜花感激卡巴星当年曾为他辩护,脱离铁窗之困。(图:星洲日报)
(柔佛‧新山29日讯)民主行动党旋风再次席捲振林山国会选区,昨晚成功在士姑来五福城露天停车场宴开近600席政治晚宴,出席者更以3万令吉的高价標下有行动党林氏父子签名的该党吉祥物“Ubah"。晚宴直至午夜12时,仍有民眾不愿离席。
由行动党振林山区部举办的“告別腐败,迈向布城"政治晚宴,被该党称为是行动党在振林山,甚至整个柔州有史以来最大型的政治晚宴。
根据大会宣佈,场內共有7千人出席,场外则有4千人出席,合共1万1千人。
当晚主讲人包括行动党国会领袖林吉祥、主席卡巴星、秘书长林冠英、峇吉里区国会议员余德华、升旗山区国会议员刘镇东、柔州联委会主席巫程豪、秘书陈正春、大会主席黄祥鑾、伊斯兰党署理主席莫哈末沙布、公正党副总秘书钟少云和前內阁部长丹斯里阿都卡迪。
林冠英表示,柔州在2008年已经错过改朝换代的机会,2013年时不能再错过,而他相信柔州人民是有勇气及有正义,就好像他的父亲林吉祥就是峇株巴辖人,一生为爭取公平及民主的国家而奋斗,民眾要改变就要投火箭。
他说,人民要的是一个听人民话、为人民做事、给人民期望的政府。
他指出,听人民话的政府应该是强化国家教育,制度化的拨款给独中及承认统考文凭。
他说,做政府的应该要法治,而不是人治,不能因为靠关係而获得政府工程,必须凭实力来爭取。
他表示,当自己成为檳州首长后,已经指示檳州的工程都必须通过公开招標进行,这就是为甚么檳城现在如此乾净。
林吉祥:要改变就有希望
林吉祥说:“我们已经等了55年,再等多6个月就可以改朝换代,因此农历新年时大家忍一忍,不要为了出国旅行而错过改朝换代的机会。"
他认为,明年大选的几率高达60%,但也不能排除另有40%是今年举行大选的可能性,不过无论何时大选,只要柔州人民作出改变,民联入主布城就有希望。
他指出,马华昨天也举办了万人宴会,可惜天不作美,这已经是很清楚的暗示。
卡巴星:人民强烈求变
卡巴星则指出,当晚出席晚宴的人数已证明柔州人民愿意作出改变,而他也有信心来届大选全马人民也会作出改变。
他说,民联三党已经同意,入主布城后,將由国会反对党领袖拿督斯里安华出任首相一职。
他也讽刺马华、民政、国大党在308大海啸中几乎“死掉",这已透露了人民求变的强烈讯息。
李毅平献花感谢卡巴星
此外,曾在內安法令下坐牢10年的李毅平(译音),在卡巴星为他辩护下脱离铁窗生活,所以他特別准备了鲜花感谢卡巴星当年的帮助。