Showing posts with label The Economist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Economist. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

不滿批國陣重返種族政策,馬哈迪抨《經濟學人》

马哈迪,何必反驳?你越驳越抹黑自己!国际的眼光是雪亮的!
------------------------------------------
2013-10-16 09:34

(雪蘭莪‧八打靈再也15日訊)前首相敦馬哈迪抨擊英國新聞雜誌周刊《經濟學人》一篇指“強化土著經濟政策”顯示國陣返回種族政策的報導,反諷後者的邏輯是任何想要賦予(佔馬來西亞68%人口的)馬來人和土著企業股份(及財富),並成為專業人士的政策都是不公平、錯誤和不公正的。
該篇報導名為“Bumi, not booming(不蓬勃發展的土著社群)”,副題是“The ruling party returns to it sold habits of race-based handouts(執政黨返回到種族政策的舊習慣)”。
他昨日在其部落格發表的《政治家對比記者》一文中反諷《經濟學人》,“(他們認為)自由人士不應該這麼做,若人們得不到任何的財富共享和專業地位,那麼他們就應當只做可憐的觀眾。”
指納吉拉攏華人卻被拒
“(原來)做正確的事情就是幫助那些殷實富裕的人們變得更加富裕,更富有的社群變得更富有,並使貧困的社區變得更貧窮。”
他也說,首相拿督斯里納吉在大選前曾試圖拉攏華人而忽視馬來人的困境,甚至忽略國家教育政策,而以金錢支援華教。
“不過,華裔選民拒絕了他,他只獲得3%的華人選票,這聽起來多麼忘恩負義。”
“對此,(經濟學人卻說)納吉應發放更多的錢,這才是正確的事。”
他表示,馬來人支持納吉,納吉回報大選支持,但顯然地,根據《經濟學人》的說法,“支持那些支持你的人是錯誤的,你不(應該)在文明國家這樣做,讓支持者腐爛去吧。”
馬哈迪在其部落格點名《經濟學人》多篇有關里約熱內盧、巴西、德國、巴基斯坦、印度及斯里蘭卡的重要政經新聞報導,以及該刊物針對西方政府、電子煙、伊朗核武的分析,總結認為,《經濟學人》作者似乎自以為知道這個世界的一切,也知道如何治愈所有這些苦痛。
“依照西方媒體及經濟學家的智慧話語,顯然地,由記者和專業作家掌舵的世界才可高枕無憂。
為甚麼我們之前想不到呢?”
《經濟學人》:被迫走回頭路
“納吉信譽大受打擊”
《經濟學人》“Bumi,not booming”發佈於9月28日,指出首相拿督斯里納吉是倒退回種族政治的“主要損失者”;在大選前,他被視為一個偉大的改革家,然而為了從巫統保守派的衝擊下生存下來,納吉現在被迫突然走回頭路,信譽大受打擊。
報導說,“強化土著經濟政策”是納吉明目張膽地在取悅那些批評他在大選時放棄馬來人的人士,這些舉動至少在目前讓納吉保存勢力,使其在巫統的領導地位不會面臨挑戰。
指慕克力崛起威脅納吉
再者,前首相敦馬哈迪兒子拿督慕克力勢力的崛起也是納吉的隱憂,若慕克力勝選,反納吉勢力可能會圍繞著他,納吉可不願變成弱勢首相而後在內部政變被推翻。
“然而,無可否認地,納吉的信譽已遭受損害。許多馬來西亞人,甚至馬來人,都認為納吉為了挽救權位不惜犧牲政治原則;他強調種族和諧的“一個馬來西亞”口號,如今只是一番空談。”
報導指出,在馬來西亞為“強化土著經濟政策”耗資數十億令吉的同時,華印裔人才將因厭惡種族主義而持續外流他國。這個國家2020年成為高收入國的目標,將會如同納吉的偉大改革一樣,進一步消退。

Friday, October 5, 2012

Najib, No Time Like Tomorrow


Another budget, more cash handouts and more dithering over an election date

Najib, coiled for action
THE prime minister, Najib Razak, fancies himself as the Tony Blair of Malaysian politics. Like the former British prime minister, Mr Najib purports to be a progressive reformer, on a mission to “modernise” his country. The British-educated Mr Najib also likes to pay as much attention to the spin on his policies as to their substance. He even hires former Blair advisers to make sure he gets it right.
For all that, Mr Najib increasingly resembles the hapless Gordon Brown, Mr Blair’s nemesis and successor. For years Mr Brown agitated to push his rival aside. When at last he succeeded, Mr Brown blew it by missing the chance to call an early election while he was still relatively popular. Rather than winning his own mandate, Mr Brown, unelected and indecisive, watched his authority drain away until he was boxed into calling an election right at the end of his term—which he then lost.
Similarly, Mr Najib took over after an internal party coup in April 2009 against the then prime minister, Abdullah Badawi. Talk of an early election for Mr Najib to secure his own mandate first surfaced towards the end of 2010. He himself began to talk up his chances the following June. Then an election was expected towards the middle of this year. All along, Malaysia has been on an election footing, with the cautious Mr Najib ponderously cultivating the voters.
He has crafted new policies for Malaysia’s younger, unaligned citizens while giving away plenty of money to retain his party’s traditional supporters, especially among the ethnic-Malay (and Muslim) majority. In the budget in late September more cash handouts went to poorer households and a one-month salary bonus to all government workers. They usually vote for Mr Najib’s United Malays National Organisation (UMNO).
Would that there were more to show for all the shadow electioneering. Opinion polls conducted by the respected Merdeka Centre (the latest were for June) gave the prime minister an approval rating of 64%, down from the high point of his popularity in the middle of 2010. Still not bad, you might think, but the popularity of the ruling coalition, the Barisan Nasional (BN), is much lower than the prime minister’s own. So now Mr Najib’s options are diminishing fast. He is required to call an election by April at the latest. In the process he has acquired a reputation for dithering, and now has the regrettable distinction of being Malaysia’s second-longest-serving unelected prime minister, just behind his own father, the country’s second prime minister.
Given UMNO’s deep pockets and its practice of gerrymandering constituency boundaries, winning a simple majority has always looked relatively easy for Mr Najib. After all, the ruling coalition, made up of UMNO and several smaller parties, has achieved that in every election since independence in 1957. Yet Mr Najib’s real aim is to win back the two-thirds majority that the BN lost for the first time at the last election, in 2008. In so doing the BN lost its power, among other things, to tinker with the constitution. That failure led directly to the coup against Mr Badawi and the elevation of Mr Najib. The prime minister knows that if he fails to reverse the humiliation of 2008, a genuinely hard task, then he could go the same way as his predecessor. (His chief protection is that personally he remains more popular than the BN.)
Mr Najib has also been spooked by a series of political setbacks. His government mishandled a couple of huge rallies by a coalition of NGOs called Bersih (meaning “clean” in Malay) campaigning for fair elections. And poring perhaps too closely over the minutiae of local-election results, the BN has fretted over a fall in support among Chinese voters. They form the largest minority in the country’s complex ethnic mosaic.
The problem for Malaysia is that the rival parties have been at such a high pitch of combat-readiness for such a long time that the resulting partisanship is poisoning national politics. Pretty murky at the best of times, politics is becoming dirtier by the day. UMNO and its friends in the press and television have been relentless in their assaults on any organisation, such as Bersih, that is deemed to be sympathetic to the opposition. Another target has been an excellent independent website called Malaysiakini. All the old canards about these sorts of groups being in the pay of Zionists, America or George Soros, a foreign financier, have been trotted out. It is not clear whether such slanders still impress Malaysia’s voters, especially its Muslims. They are certainly a sign of desperation.